Lunchbox Lemma

I wrote this essay for my Food in American History course. WE were tasked with detailing our own personal food history. I had a lot of fun with this assignment and decided to share. Hope you enjoy 🙂

Nearly every day, I fortuitously kick my metal Power Rangers lunchbox and disrupt class. In many ways, loudis the best word to describe this lunchbox: not only does the bright yellow tin box make inconvenient loud noises, but it’s become my unique identifier across campus.  It catches people’s attention.  Many comment saying how they loved that show, wondering which is my favorite Ranger, and asking if I had it since my childhood.  I hate to break the news that I never watched the Power Rangers and that I bought the lunchbox on Amazon, so I tell them the Red Ranger is my favorite and that, indeed, I’ve had it for a long while.  Truth is, this lunchbox is far more functional than fashionable and its existence, while loud, says an awful lot about my seldom-spoken perspectives on food more generally.  There were several factors influencing my purchase of this lunchbox, but they all relate back to my distaste for unethically raised agriculture, unsustainable food systems, and overly processed foods, as well as a devotion to become my healthiest self.  My lunchbox reflects the importance I place on my food choices and my recognition that what I choose to consume matters to my health and the health of the planet in a real way.  In many ways, the food protected by the five Rangers symbolizes my love for the process of cooking, a pursuit I hold as a spiritual practice.  But that’s a remarkably long way away from frozen chicken nuggets and marshmallow fluff on white bread, so let’s give this story due justice.

I was a picky eater the moment I discovered that some foods taste better than others.  Simple tastes determined my childhood favorites, foods like bread and butter, strawberries and whipped cream, chicken nuggets and honey.  I have memories of being in my high chair, chowing down on cauliflower and broccoli.  Then I was presented chicken nuggets, and vegetables were out of the question.  In no time I became a chicken nugget connoisseur. I implemented the “Dinosaur or Don’t Bother” policy in my household, maintaining that dinosaur-shaped nuggets were the only allowable form.  In a desperate attempt to nourish her stubborn child, my mother let me dip the nuggets in honey (I had outlawed ketchup, too).  Eating out was a spectacle: when the dinner rolls were consumed, I would top off the first course with a sole packet of butter (I was onto this keto thing long before popular culture).  Thanksgiving used to be my least favorite holiday.  I didn’t like turkey, sweet potatoes, or cranberry sauce, but I loved bread.  So I had bread and topped it off with whipped cream because the adults didn’t want me to cause a fuss.  In grade school, the thought of jelly on bread made me sick, so marshmallow fluff and peanut butter was on the menu every day—except every other Friday when they served triangle pizza with cheesy crust.  To avoid harassment, I made sure to start eating lunch meat by middle school.

As my taste buds matured past early childhood, pasta with parmesan cheese became a staple.  At times, it was without a doubt my favorite food.  At eight years old, pasta was the first thing I learned how to cook.  This wheat-filled pasta, as we all know, is great fuel for physical activities and remained central to my life as athletics and “high performance nutrition” became a part of my life.  From chocolate milk after a lift to protein bars and Gatorade after practice, I consumed anything with a “protein” label.  In middle school and high school, my mom packed my lunch in a brown bag with a cold cut sandwich, pretzels, some veggies, fruit, and often a protein bar to be eaten after school.  This diet seemed “healthy” to any outside observer, surely better than the pizza and fries eaten by my friends.  On an unrelated note, I got a stomach ache every day around sixth period.  This trend of simple-tasting, quick-fuel food was the story of my food journey until age sixteen when I got a job at the Craft Ale House, a gastropub with farm-to-table meals.

For two and a half years I was exposed to different foods and culinary styles in the restaurant world.  As a food runner and bar back, I saw more ahi-tuna variations and memorized more charcuterie plate cheeses than I care to remember.  Although I never worked behind the line, I became a part of the mealtime experience.  Fresh cracked pepper, a topped off soda, and extra remoulade went a long way for customers eager to enjoy a night out.  Relishing in the dining itself, I learned, was as important as the food being served. When demanding schedules forced me out of food running, I began dishwashing.  Though torturous work, I developed a knack for scrubbing pots and pans. Knuckles bloodied from steel wool and scolding hot water, I always left work with a sense of accomplishment: with my help, the chefs and cooks were able to prepare elegant meals and memorable dishes.  I played a role in the restaurant experience by being the best dishwasher I could be. And once I perfected my craft, I actually began to enjoy it.  Not to mention, working in the back of house meant I got to try the chef’s creations. From coffee ground-rubbed bison to deep fried, crab-stuffed avocado, my palate was expanding by the shift.  

As my final years of high school engendered a sense of culinary adventure, that hope for never-before tasted dishes on a regular basis was squashed when I entered college.  First year dorms don’t have kitchens, so all freshmen are required to have meal plans. I explored Campion Dining Hall with an open mind and an ambition to make the best of what was offered. Unfortunately, the best of Campion was omelets for breakfast, wraps for lunch, and pasta for dinner.  Rinse and repeat.  I not only got bored of my options but ended up getting sick with sinus infections, colds, and intense seasonal allergies on a regular basis. Date nights with my girlfriend were the only reprieve.  We dove head-first into Asian cuisine including Thai, Vietnamese, and Japanese, as well as brunch, America’s greatest tradition.  While Narberth, Ardmore, and Manayunk yielded many new foods, I wanted a change for my daily nutrition.  I wanted to learn how to cook before entering my sophomore year apartment, fully equipped with a kitchen.  That summer I read a book called How to Eat, Move, and Be Healthy!by Paul Chek, a health coach and therapist I’d known about for some time.  As clichĂ© as it sounds, this book changed my life forever.

Paul Chek transformed my perspective on food.  He explained that human beings aren’t evolutionarily designed to thrive on highly processed foods and how whole foods ought to be the center of our diet. This book introduced me to simple concepts like eating foods that are alive (or raw), how fat isn’t the enemy, and how added sugar is wreaking havoc on the health of our nation.  Paul explained the telltale signs of gluten intolerance: stomach ache, headache, a weakened immune system, etc.  Remember those post-lunch stomach aches in high school? I was gluten intolerant, confirmed it by a period of eliminating gluten and watching my symptoms dissipate.  Also introduced in How to Eat, Move, and Be Healthy!was the concept of metabolic typing, that is, that different people fair better on specific diets.  I learned that I do best on a diet higher in fat and protein and lower in carbohydrates, especially refined sugars. Paul also justified the importance of buying organic produce, grass fed beef, pasture raised chickens, and wild caught fish.  I later learned about the perils of commercial agriculture, from the destruction of ecosystems due to overused chemical fertilizers to the carcinogenic impacts of glyphosate, or RoundUp.  Other concepts like buying and supporting local farmers rounded out Paul’s work.

Thus, the food I choose to purchase, cook, eat, and share with my loved ones matters.  In a very real way, I am voting with my fork and my knife, with the dollars I spend on groceries.  If I purchase feedlot meat and highly-processed, commercial tofu, I am supporting operations that contribute to global climate change, maltreat livestock, destroy our disappearing soils, and put small, local farmers out of business. However, if I instead purchase local, grass-fed beef and edamame grown on an organic farm in my county, I am supporting people who are doing their part to heal the planet and produce healthy, nourishing food.  This is an intentional process, one that has to do with the whole system of food production and consumption.  From the health of soil to the health of the meal on my plate, I’ve come to see eating and cooking as a spiritual practice.  I thought about it like this: the food I eat literally becomes me.  If I am what I eat, then I want to be the healthiest Me possible, because it is only with my health that I can live out my mission on this earth.  The extra price of maintaining this holistic, nutritional approach is the best investment I could ever make because sooner or later, my health will be my number one concern.

That edict is quite a long way from chicken nuggets and whipped cream.  What began as a desire for simple mouth pleasures has become a quest to discover what food is best for me.  As I’ve realized what true nutrition ought to be, I understood that my commercially stocked dining hall couldn’t meet my health standards.  Cooking came out of necessity to get the simplistic, whole foods nutrition I needed without the additives and chemicals of dining hall meals.  So I began sautĂ©ing and searing and baking and slow-cooking and calling my mom when I messed up.  I started seasoning with sea salt and pepper, while slowly moving into more complex tastes like rosemary, cayenne, and turmeric.  With chicken and rice as staples, I began to venture into unknown waters.  I experimented with chicken stocks, with cutlets, with vegetable chili, with pork soup dumplings.  Eggs and avocado, eggs and oatmeal, eggs and ground beef, and eggs and kale have all entered the fold.  While my cooking isn’t quite exquisite, I cook almost every day, blending flavors and trying new concoctions.  But every meal I cook begins with the same thing: quality ingredients—organic for sure, local if possible.

I’ve found that many people dislike cooking because they dislike cleaning up. Luckily for me, my dishwashing stint exposed me to the mental anguish of cleaning, showing me that, in the end, scrubbing pots and pans doesn’t have to be painful.  When my mother cooks a meal, she uses every dish in the house and refuses to clean them (rightfully so).  Out of necessity, I brought the art of dishwashing home and have actually begun to enjoy it.  You heard that right, I enjoy cleaning up.  I see it as a meditation.  It’s the most peaceful and orderly moment of my day.  Coupled with the spiritual act of combining ingredients that will become me, dishwashing rounds out the experience of eating I have each day. The dishwasher is helpful, but nothing can outweigh the joy that comes with a clean sink.  I truly believe more people would cook if they didn’t fear cleaning up so much.  It should be cleaning first, then cooking.

And so we’ve arrived back to the metal Power Rangers lunchbox.  In an effort to support sustainable agriculture and local, community farms that produce nourishing whole foods, I lug my lunchbox across campus.  Filled with turmeric-salmon salad, overnight oats, or chicken legs and rice, this trusted tin gives me the freedom cook and emboldens me with the knowledge of where my food comes from.  That, and because my intolerance to gluten rules out sandwiches.  All of this to sustain a healthy body so that I can have a healthy mind so that I can work to create a healthier world.  Now, I by no means follow these principles incredibly well. I still love chocolate, ice cream, and have a weakness for blue corn tortilla chips.  But an ideal is something to strive towards, and strive I do, day in and day out.  

About every other week, you can find me in the dessert section at Whole Foods with my girlfriend (the same one), picking out the perfect cannoli.  I believe life is about balance, not strict adherence to a dietary philosophy.  The goal is to create robust health so that an ice cream cone here or there won’t destroy you.  If I had watched the Power Rangers, I’d make a reference about how the Rangers protected people and fought for the common good.  But I didn’t, so I’ll just go finish cleaning up my dishes.

TRUST Model

Last semester in my leadership class, my group and I developed the TRUST Model for our Leadership project. The intention was simple: every topic we covered throughout the course dealt with interpersonal relationships, but none of them addressed how to build the most important part of any relationship, that is, trust. So this model helps people to first become a trustworthy individual and then move into trusting relationships with others.

Here’s how the TRUST acronym works:

  • Talented
  • Reliable
  • Unifying Mission
  • Supportive
  • Transparent

Imagine there are two magnifying glasses hovering over the word TRUST. The first magnifying glass includes the first 3 letters which stand for Talented, Reliable, and Unifying Mission. This is the Personal Lens. The second magnifying glass includes the last 3 letters which stand for Unifying Mission, Supportive, and Transparent. This is the Interpersonal Lens.

So to become a trustworthy person, it would help to become talented at the specific task you’re focusing on and reliable showing up each day with the same vigor and effectiveness. Next, it’s time to move into relationships with others. To get other people to place their trust in you, being supportive of them and honest are musts. To tie everything altogether, it’s important to always consider the Mission, the cause greater than yourself, that unites you and your teammate together.

This is how to become a Trustworthy person that can enter into trusting relationships with others.

Motherless Brooklyn

Edward Norton — On Creative Process, Creative Struggle, and Motherless Brooklyn (#393)

Leaders are learners.  A good leader is somebody who is open to new ideas and perspectives no matter what discipline they come from.  In terms of current events, I couldn’t think of a more powerful account of vision than Edward Norton’s vision in creating Motherless Brooklyn.  Based off of a 1999 novel by Jonathan Lethem, Motherless Brooklyn follows the story of Lionel Essrog, a New York City detective with Tourette’s.  

Shortly after reading the novel, Edward Norton read it, loved it, and secured the rights to create a film adaptation of it.  Norton worked on the film for over 15 years–he suffered a few writers blocks, a few breaks from acting, and couldn’t rest until he made the perfect film.  He wouldn’t be satisfied until his vision for the film matched the quality of the novel, a task few films ever meet.  This conversation on the Tim Ferriss show delves into Norton’s project of creating this film.  

His dedication to the creative process and final production of this film is truly inspiring for all of us leaders who have dreams that people don’t think we can attain.  Norton proves the opposite.  Apparently this movie is excellent, from the soundtrack to the cinematography. 

Senator Bob Casey

A classmate in my Perspective on Leadership course is related to Senator Bob Casey (PA). In an effort to learn from thoughtful leaders in the world, we set up a video conference call tonight and were able to ask him questions. We talked about personal values, what it means to be of service, and how faith can inspire your decisions. It was a productive conversation.

Senator Casey placed a great deal of significance on his faith and Jesuit education. Though people who vote for him may not share his beliefs, he is unapologetic in believing in God and sharing how is faith impacts his choices in life. He told to remember the song We Are Called when discerning our own missions in life. The hymn goes as follows:

We are called to act with justice,

We are called to love tenderly,

We are called to serve one another,

To walk humbly with God.

I find politics confusing and boring, but this conversation reminded me that politicians are people too. There’s a great deal we can learn from our public officials, and Senator Casey affirmed that tonight. The next time I vote, I’m going to vote on character rather than policy. We need thoughtful, grounded leaders in office.

Thank you, Senator Casey.

What makes you so certain?

While talking with my philosophy professor today, we began discussing the nature of belief. I mentioned how sometimes, for believers, it can be reassuring to study somebody like Thomas Aquinas—one of the most brilliant minds to ever live who also believes in God. We then got into a discussion about the new atheists. The leaders of this modern-day atheist movement are often scientists at the top of their fields, true experts of their specific disciplines. These individuals, like Richard Dawkins, often dismiss the reality of God based on weak arguments. Then people listen and believe them. They’re experts, after all.

But what qualifies an expert on evolutionary biology to dispute, with utmost certainty, nearly all philosophic discussion of God? How can he claim to know more than a modern philosopher who studies, thinks, and meditated deeply on these issues?

Herein lies the difference between the philosopher and the scientist: a scientist knows; a philosopher knows there is always more to know. I would venture to say that good scientists ought to be more like philosophers and admit that they don’t really know, they they can’t really be certain about much.

Uncertainty may seem uncomfortable at first. To me, it seems like a far happier place to live.

A Question about Death (featured on Aubrey Marcus Podcast with Alex Banayan)

A few months ago, Alex Banayan, author of the New York Times’ Best Seller The Third Door, tweeted that him and Aubrey Marcus were gonna do Q&A during their podcast together. Naturally, I was thinking about death a lot that day, so I tweeted them the following question:

Aubrey, you’ve talked a lot about “knowing” what the other side is like because you’ve been there on medicine journeys. This seems to have almost obliterated your fear of death. But fearing death and overcoming that fear seem to be a deep, unifying part of the human experience…

Many believe that having an understanding—and even a fear—of death can ignite a sense of urgency, leading you to live a more fulfilling life. To what extent is fearing death a good thing and and when does it get in the way? Thanks for all you do

@lemmanucci

Well, Alex and Aubrey talked about my question. They introduced me, said my name, and even hyped me up, saying “You know him. You love him. Give it up for Aaron Lemma!” It brought so much joy to my being.

It was a heavy question and it took a while to unpack it—about 50 minutes. This was the longest Aubrey Marcus Podcast to date, and my question helped to fuel that. I am so grateful to Aubrey and Alex for answering my question with such deep insight and wisdom, all while remaining students of this confusing game called life.

This experience reminded me to be curious and ask my questions without fear of judgement or embarrassment. I really gained a lot from this discussion about death and I can’t even imagine how many thousands or millions of others did too. All because I tweeted my genuine curiosity.

Here’s the link to the YooTube video of the podcast: AMP #229. Check out 50:40 and 1:40:20 for my name drop. This window encompasses the entire discussion about death. Hope you enjoy it as much as I did. If you prefer to listen, check out Aubrey Marcus Podcast wherever you get your podcasts.

Psychological Safety

A Lesson from my Perspectives on Leadership course:

Teams perform better when everybody feels safe to share ideas, concerns, questions, and mistakes without fear of judgement or embarrassment. Good leaders promote this type of environment by making every task into a learning opportunity, by admitting their own fallacies, and by promoting curiosity. This will allow employees to develop out-of-the-box thoughts and solve interesting problems.

We can all learn something about interpersonal relationships from this model.

How to Honor a Glacier

In environmental chemistry today, my professor brought up how the people of Iceland had a funeral for a glacier which melted due to climate change. In class, I voiced my opinion for why having a funeral for dying parts of the earth was a good thing, why personifying nature isn’t woo-woo but might just be necessary to actually make change. Sometime after class, my professor emailed me, saying my perspectives may have swayed her opinions. I replied with a further defense of my stance. Here is that response.

“Here’s a more elaborate perspective on the matter:

As a global society, we wouldn’t be where we are today without science.  That’s quite an understatement.  Speaking rather generally, though science has brought us very far, it’s also managed to almost wholly neglect any spiritual component or connection to the natural world.  We have become separate from nature.  We have been more or less conditioned to see this planet as something we can extract resources from, not someone that’s alive, that has a place at the table.  I believe the scientific community has a lot to learn with respect to the indigenous religions and belief systems of the Americas and other places across the globe.  Maybe it’s time we, as a society, stopped judging native people’s sun dances and conversations with trees and started listening.  I think they were on to something.

If we started treating earth as Mother Earth, maybe people would start worrying about her.  When we worry, we care–then we are moved to action.  I sincerely think we need more than just good science to convert the masses.  We need some reason for everybody to care, something that goes across partisan lines.  I think a funeral for a glacier is a step in the right direction.”

God’s Goodness

Excerpt from an analysis essay of Thomas Aquinas’ Summa Contra Gentiles Chapter 38…

​In section 4 of Chapter 38, Aquinas begins by discussing how any good thing, call it A, that exists must be good by participation in some other thing, call it B.  In this scenario B must be of a higher order than A because B is the source of A’s goodness; said in another way, any cause must be greater than its effect.  Though possible to trace a thing’s goodness back to its participation in another good thing, Aquinas argues that this pattern cannot extend to infinity because infinity is opposed to the end, and good has the nature of an end.  Stating “good has the nature of an end” indicates that each good can be traced back to the participation in another, higher good.  For this to comply, there must be a first good that doesn’t participate in any other good because there is nothing greater than it.  Its source of goodness is its own essence, not participation in any higher good.  As it previously argued, God is the only possible entity whose being is the same as its essence.  Thus we have come to Aquinas’ conclusion: because good things have the nature of an end, God must be goodness because God’s being is God’s essence.

El Camino

I’ve never watched a better TV show than Breaking Bad. One summer, I watched four and a half seasons in about three weeks, just in time to catch the last half of Season 5 as it aired live. It was one of the greatest journeys of my entertainment pursuits.

El Camino just came out today. It’s a two hour movie continuing from where the show ended. It follows the pursuit of fugitive Jessie Pinkman (played by Aaron Paul) after the massive fallout between drug lord and drug maker. This movie, like the series, was expertly crafted and well made. It met every expectation I had for it.

Great stories never die. Even when you think the story’s been told entirely, there’s always more to say, more to investigate. On a deeper note, there’s more to every story than you think. You can never know the entirety of a story—to do so would mean to understand each perspective of the characters and every motive behind their actions. This is an impossible task, so there is always more to learn.

If only professors, teachers, and educators understood this… Maybe there would be less students who hate learning and more meaningful discoveries.